Saturday, October 27, 2018

'Lives are hanging in the balance': Why some newly licensed truckers aren't ready for the road

This report from north of the border thanks to Eric Szeto, David Common, Vincent LeClair · CBC News · Links provided:
Oct 12, 2018  Undercover novice trucker earns his licence in Saskatchewan but fails Marketplace road test in Ontario
Tractor-trailers can measure up to 23 metres long carry 30-tonne loads and barrel down the highway at high speeds, but in some provinces you need more training to give a haircut than to haul freight.
A hidden-camera investigation by CBC's Marketplace reveals how Canada's patchwork training and testing system leaves some new truck drivers ill-prepared to operate big rigs — the giants of the road that are involved in about 20 per cent of deadly crashes in this country.
Truck driver testing standards vary from province to province, but perhaps even more dramatic is the disparity in training standards. Many Canadians might be shocked to learn Ontario is the only province that currently has any truck driver training requirements at all.
That means depending on where a truck driver is based, they may have had more than 100 hours of in-class and on-the-road training before getting their licence — or none at all.
"I am completely on board with saying that seems crazy," said Carole Dore, an instructor at the Ontario Truck Driving School in London.
To test those disparities, Marketplace sent an undercover student, equipped with a hidden camera, to a truck driving school in Saskatoon, where he completed 16 hours of training before passing a 45-minute provincial road test to earn his Class 1 commercial driver's licence.
The newly licensed truck driver, a 51-year-old Saskatoon business owner named Heath Muggli, then underwent a series of skill-testing challenges at the Ontario Truck Driving School, which participated in Marketplace's experiment. The evaluation included an unofficial road test led by Dore.
The goal was to have Muggli demonstrate the skills necessary to earn his Class 1 licence in Ontario, where drivers are required to complete more than 103 hours of instruction before they can even take the test.
Muggli failed almost every challenge, including one of the most basic tasks required of any trucker: properly connecting a trailer to the truck.
"It's plainly not safe to be on the road," Dore said. "Just because he has his licence doesn't mean he's ready."
Canada's trucking safety standards came under intense scrutiny last spring after the horrific crash in Saskatchewan involving a tractor-trailer and a bus carrying the Humboldt Broncos junior hockey team that killed 16 people.
The truck driver, Jaskirat Singh Sidhu, 29, of Calgary, had reportedly only completed two weeks of training before getting his commercial licence. And two different Humboldt families told Marketplace that the RCMP informed them Sidhu was making his first trip alone as a professional.
He is awaiting trial on 16 counts of dangerous driving causing death and 13 counts of dangerous driving causing bodily injury.
Once someone gets a Class 1 licence in Canada, they are able to drive trucks of virtually any size anywhere in North America. (Drivers of trucks with an air or air-over-hydraulic brake system may have to pass additional tests to obtain the required endorsement on their licence.)  
So, despite having tougher training and testing standards for truck drivers, Ontario's roads aren't necessarily safer than those of other provinces.
The number of truck crashes has gone down in recent years, but there are still tens of thousands of collisions leading to hundreds of deaths in Canada each year.

Saskatchewan vs. Ontario

Marketplace enlisted Muggli to go undercover at Maximum Training in Saskatoon. His week of training included a total of 16 hours of training, 12 of which were behind the wheel.
While Muggli learned many of the skills necessary to drive a truck safely, some important lessons weren't covered, including how to couple a trailer and how to back in to a loading dock.
The skills he wasn't taught weren't part of the test — although they are in Ontario. And much of the route he drove during training was part of the provincial road test.
He passed, but earned five demerits for making a wide turn.
As Maximum Training owner Earle Driedger explained, the training is geared around what's required to get a Class 1 licence in Saskatchewan.
"If a client only takes a one-week course, we have to show them as much as we can in a short period of time," he said in an email after Marketplace shared the findings of its investigation.
In Saskatchewan, the examiner can be an employee of Saskatchewan Government Insurance (SGI), the province's public insurer, or an instructor at a certified school.
In Muggli's case, his instructor was also his examiner.
"Road tests need to be made more challenging," Driedger said. "Testing should only be done by third-party examiners … We are in full support of mandatory training, but it has fallen on deaf ears."
Stephen Laskowski, president of the Canadian Trucking Alliance, the country's largest trucking industry group, agrees the testing standards in Saskatchewan are not tough enough.
"The test is not reflective of the occupational requirements to drive a truck, which it always should be."

'Humbling' experience

To see how ready Muggli was to operate a big rig, the Ontario Truck Driving School worked with Marketplace to stage a professional trucking test similar to what a company would ask a potential employee to complete before getting hired.
The test was based on Ontario's revamped test for commercial truck drivers.
It included doing a pre-trip inspection, coupling and uncoupling the trailer, emergency procedure preparedness, and a road test with a partially loaded trailer.
Muggli made extra wide turns that led to close calls with other vehicles. At one point, instructor Carole Dore had to pull the emergency brake because Muggli was about to run a red light into oncoming traffic.
She said Muggli failed the test before leaving the parking lot.
Muggli called the experience "humbling."
"I wouldn't say that I was overconfident, but I thought, 'OK, I'm somewhat comfortable doing this,' and it was a terrific illustration today of how unready I am."
Stephen Laskowski of the Canadian Trucking Alliance said the vast majority of trucking companies would never hire someone with Muggli's experience and skill level in the first place.
But "the frightening thing," he said, is the "bottom-feeders" just might, which puts Canadians at risk.

Driver shortage

Canada is facing a severe driver shortage and needs tens of thousands of new truckers to replace those who are retiring.
The combination of the driver shortage and the added costs associated with mandatory training for students could be one reason provinces have been reluctant to impose tougher standards, Laskowski said.
Since Ontario introduced its mandatory entry-level training requirements in 2017, only Alberta has committed to introducing its own version in 2019. Saskatchewan and Manitoba are considering changes but have not provided timelines.
"We know improvements are required," Joe Hargrave, the Saskatchewan minister responsible for SGI, said in a statement. "SGI officials have been working since last summer with industry and stakeholders to improve and standardize a training program for Class 1 drivers."

'Needs to be much stricter training'

Pattie Babij of Falkland, B.C., isn't willing to wait for the provinces to catch up.
She plans to present Transportation Minister Marc Garneau with a petition asking for a federal licensing program that would include mandatory training.
Her husband, Stephen Babij, was killed in 2017 after a semi crossed into his lane and collided head-on with his semi on a mountain road near near Revelstoke, B.C. The driver of the other truck was fined $2,000 for careless driving.​
Babij has since had to sell their farm and move to Alberta, she said.
"Why does a hairstylist require more training than a professional driver pulling, you know, just under 40,000 kilograms?" she said.
"There needs to be a much stricter training component. I really, really want it to be done federally."
Driver training and licensing is traditionally a responsibility of the provinces, but the federal government does have the authority to impose rules for commercial drivers who cross provincial borders.
Transport Canada already regulates how long truckers can be on the road without rest and will be making electronic logbooks mandatory as of 2020.
The Saskatchewan government told Marketplace it would be "in favour of uniform standards across the country" imposed by the federal government.
Garneau said he will encourage each province to adopt their own minimum entry-level training standards at the annual Council of Ministers Responsible for Transportation and Highway Safety in January.
When asked whether he would impose federal standards if the provinces fail to act, Garneau replied: "It's a bridge I'll cross when it gets to that."

'Political posturing'

Russell Herold, whose 16-year-old son Adam was killed in the Humboldt Broncos tragedy in April, called the minister's message "political posturing."
"Lives are hanging in the balance and we're talking about timelines and hoping provinces jump on board," he said. "It just makes me angry."
Over the summer, Herold launched a lawsuit against the truck driver, his employer, and the manufacturer of the bus.
He said he hopes the lawsuit will help force the industry to change its ways, but the federal government should take action immediately.
"Make this a priority. Make saving lives a priority," he said. "Why would we wait until somebody else dies on the highway?"
Data analysis by Vincent LeClair, Roberto Rocha, Kirthana Sasitharan, David McKie. Additional research by CBC reference librarians Patrick Mooney, Ginny Oakley, Cathy Ross, Diana Redegeld and Kate Zieman.


Wednesday, October 24, 2018

Independent Contractor Case Heard By The Supreme Court

trucks.com
Article thanks to ocj.com and gobytrucknews.com. Links provided:


Oct 16, 2018  On Oct. 3, the US Supreme Court heard oral arguments in New Prime v. Oliveira, No. 17-340.
New Prime, Inc. is a national trucking company that recruits and trains new drivers through an apprenticeship program. Student apprentices participating in this program are unpaid, except during one phase of the program when they receive 14 cents per mile driven. New Prime waives the tuition of student apprentices who agree to work for New Prime for one year after completing the program.
After Dominic Oliveira successfully completed the apprenticeship program, New Prime encouraged him to become an independent contractor and referred him to other entities with offices in the same building and owned by the same company as New Prime to help him form a limited liability company and to secure a truck. Oliveira then signed an Independent Contractor Agreement with New Prime. The contract specified that there was no employer-employee relationship between Oliveira and New Prime, and that Oliveira was an independent contractor. The contract also contained an arbitration clause.
Oliveira alleges New Prime underpaid him and exercised such control over him that he was unable to work for other companies. He stopped driving for New Prime as an independent contractor. He did, however, later rejoin New Prime as a company driver. Dissatisfied with the pay as a company driver as well, Oliveira sued New Prime in the US District Court for the District of Massachusetts in a putative class action proceeding. Oliveira alleged that New Prime had failed to pay minimum wages under the Fair Labor Standards Act and the Missouri minimum wage statute. He also claimed breach of contract or unjust enrichment. New Prime insisted that Oliveira arbitrate his claim.
Oliveira has mostly prevailed with his claims in the lower courts. When oral arguments were heard by the Supreme Court, only eight justices were sitting, and since Oliveira prevailed in the lower court, he only needs four votes to tip the scales of justice in his favor.
If the Supreme Court rules in Oliveira’s favor, trucking companies might have more difficulty labeling drivers as independent contractors. Companies might also be prohibited from requiring independent contractors to settle issues via arbitration. Those drivers could sue in court, and the cases could even involve class actions.


Thursday, October 18, 2018

Longtime Truck Driver Reflects on Being a Woman on the Road

Article thanks to Deborah Lockridge and truckinginfo.com. Links provided: 
Aug 27, 2018:  When Stephanie Klang’s then-husband taught her to drive a truck in 1980, allowing her to escape the poverty she grew up in, she never expected that one day her likeness would be one of four women drivers featured on a special CFI tractor.
This month, Joplin, Missouri-based truckload carrier CFI unveiled several custom-designed, large-format truck wraps. While four recognized the company’s military veterans, one was a “She Drives CFI” theme, honoring four of the company’s longest-tenured women drivers. The “She Drives CFI” truck will be a working rig, but will also attend events where it may especially resonate, such as a “Run Like a Girl” 5k race or a Girl Scouts or Women in Trucking event.  
The four professional CFI women drivers pictured on the “She Drives CFI” truck wrap are Stephanie Klang, Joplin, Missouri; Alisha Slaughter, El Paso, Texas; Tanya Lateyice, Albuquerque, New Mexico; and Jemcia Turner, Tulsa, Oklahoma.
Klang may be the most well known, having been one of the few women to be an America’s Road Team captain for the American Trucking Associations as well as through her work with the Women in Trucking organization. When Scott Darling was administrator of the Federal Motor Carrier Administration, WIT organized an educational ride-along with Klang at the wheel.
With 3 million safe miles under her belt, Klang retired earlier this year to spend more time with her second husband and her cats, enjoying Zumba and yoga classes at the Y and some part-time work doing community outreach with CFI.

Trucking out of Poverty

“We have a happy home,” Klang said in an interview with HDT. “One of the reasons I got on the truck in the first place, I did not have a happy home life growing up – I wanted away. I was raised by a single mother on a welfare check, and she worked so hard to make ends meet. Back then in ‘70s, the welfare system just beat you down. I got a job as a high school student making $30 a month, and when social services found out about it, they reduced my mother’s check by $30.”
So she started driving team with her husband in 1980. The two changed jobs about every two years, until in 1987, “we came to CFI and I said, this was it.” Eventually she and her husband parted ways, and in 1995, he took his truck and left, while Klang stayed on and hit the road with her tomcat as a solo driver for CFI. “I traded my husband for a job,” she said, laughing in a CFI video. “It was a good choice.”
The best part about the transition? “I got to do everything my way,” she told HDT. “I loved the fact that I could sleep sitting still. Of course, if anything had to be done, I had to do it, but that was no trouble, if a trailer had to be cleaned up and boards pulled, I could do that. I did learn a lot more about pre trips and inspecting equipment. I chained up a few times. It was a small price to pay for getting to do everything my way.”
In 2006, she married another CFI driver, but they stayed in separate trucks, coordinating their time off at home. “People assumed we would drive team, and I was like, are you kidding me? I’m not sharing this living space!”
 Facing Sexual Harassment as a Female Truck Driver
As a woman driver, Klang admitted, she did face some sexual harassment, especially when she was younger.
“Some of it was bad, but it never crossed over to physical harassment; it was just words,” she said. “The way I dealt with it was I just acted like I didn’t hear them. They got no reaction.”
Klang recalls in her early 20s walking through warehouses to get to the shipping office to sign papers and enduring catcalls from the warehouse workers. “Then I’d go out to the truck and cry. But you get a tougher skin. I’ve never felt threatened physically. There’s been some stupid men out there. But I think you find stupid men in every field.”
Sometimes she’s had a smart comeback. Klang recalled the time she was driving down I-44 a few miles from home and heard some chatter on the CB as two trucks passed her, along the lines of, “I’d sure like to spend some time with that gal.”
“I couldn’t help it, sometimes I’m witty, and I got on the CB and said, ‘Just get off here and park at my house – I have a whole bunch of yard work to do and we’ll spend some time together!’ And they ran off like scalded dogs. The last thing I heard was, ‘Oh no, that sounds like living in mom’s house, no way.’”
When we asked Klang what about CFI makes it a good fit for women drivers, why she’s stayed with the company for so long, she talked about the same types of things that make fleets appealing to any driver. Back in 1987 when she started, they ran legal – no forcing drivers to falsify their logbooks. Reliable equipment keeps you rolling and earning. If you were doing a drop and hook and the trailer had a mechanical issue, she said, they would fix it right away. Good communication. She’s never had a paycheck screw-up in 31 years. “It’s a trucking company, so the miles go up and down, but there was a good average. And when you hit Joplin [CFI headquarters], the people are friendly.”
And, Clang said, CFI is a big supporter of the Women in Trucking association.
They must be doing something right, because out of CFI’s 2,000-driver workforce, 14% are women, which is well above the industry average. WIT/National Transportation Institute research found that women made up 7.89% of over-the-road drivers at the end of 2017.
Trucking has given Klang confidence and independence, helped her discover herself, gotten her out of poverty, paid for her home, and allowed her to help her family. In fact, she told HDT, she finds it pretty ironic that the little girl raised on a welfare check now has a financial advisor to help her invest her money wisely.
“The advice I would tell my younger self is not to sell yourself short,” Klang said. “To believe in myself more, to believe I’m more capable than I thought I was ... because I am.”
For more information about CFI career opportunities for women, visit here.


Friday, October 12, 2018

QOTD: The State of a Scarlet Letter?

Article thanks to Corey Lewis and thetruthaboutcars.com. Links provided:


Aug 22, 2018  The plate in question is the mustard yellow one seen above. It looks nothing like the other license plates of Ohio, and that’s because it’s only available to a particular type of criminal offender. Introduced back in 1967, Ohio’s OVI (Operating a Vehicle Impaired) plates were designed as a scarlet letter for those convicted of OVI offenses.
Though they create a way to identify offenders in everyday traffic, use of the plates remained fairly limited for decades. Plates were assigned individually, and only at the discretion of a judge. The state of Ohio took notice, deciding it wanted to see expanded use of the special plates, and on January 1st, 2014, it altered the OVI legislation. Plates became mandatory for OVI offenders on their second occurrence, and also in instances where an offender’s BAC was over two times the legal driving limit.
After the OVI conviction, a driver can apply for a restricted driver’s license that requires use of the yellow OVI plate, commonly called “party plates,” within the state. The standard time requirement for carrying the plates is six months to a year. Ohio is unique in this special plate usage. While two other states (Georgia and Minnesota) can add an additional letter to an OVI offender’s plate, Ohio is the only one with an entirely different OVI plate design.
Those in favor of the special plate argue the pressure and embarrassment achieved by its usage is a good deterrent for OVI offenders, who are very inclined to become repeat offenders. The plates identify drivers who need to be watched in traffic by other motorists and police.
Those against the plate argue they unfairly shame offenders for past crimes, make them a target for police on the road, and an outcast in the employee parking lot. The plate punishes repeat offenders the same as severe first-time offenders. There’s also some collateral damage, in the shaming of passengers in a car wearing OVI plates.
As mentioned, Ohio is out there on their own on this one — no other states have followed Ohio’s example in over 50 years. As a resident of Ohio, I’ve seen these plates in use on many occasions. They’re pretty noticeable. Are these special OVI plates something other states would do well to mimic, or is Ohio off the rails on this one?
Off to you, B&B.



Wednesday, October 3, 2018

Apology issued for Chicago bait truck

Article thanks to Tom Quimby and hardworkingtrucks.com. Links provided:
Score one for justice? Really?
Aug 19, 2018  Sting operations in Chicago designed to curtail rising cargo thefts took a big hit recently as Norfolk Southern Railway buckled under pressure, apologized for leading an undercover bait truck operation and vowed never to use the same tactic again.
That’s great news for cargo thieves including three men who were facing felony charges for breaking into the trailer of a truck that Norfolk had parked in Englewood, an impoverished suburb of the city where cargo heists have been an ongoing problem.
Theft charges for all three men were dropped following outcries of injustice from some notable mouthpieces including the American Civil Liberties Union and former head of the Chicago Police Board, Lori Lightfood, who’s currently running for mayor against embattled Mayor Rahm Emanuel.
When pressed for an explanation as to why the charges were dropped, a representative with the Cook County State Attorney’s Office told the Chicago Tribune that “it was in the interest of justice.”
The interest of justice? That’s an interesting take on justice. How about justice for all the victims that have been robbed and shot by criminals that gained access to dozens of firearms that were stolen last October from a rail car in Chicago? How about justice for truck drivers and companies that fall victim to cargo theft?
As it turns out, Chicago police were hoping that ‘Operation Trailer Trap’ would lead to more information concerning that theft of 104 firearms. After all, it didn’t take long for those guns to show up at crime scenes around the city which continues to generate more and more headlines reporting on deadly violence. Less than a dozen of those guns have been recovered.
But apparently politics trumps property rights and public safety. Between Saturday afternoon and Sunday morning, 23 people were shot, two fatally including a 26-year-old man in Englewood. The tragic irony here is that Chicago has some of the toughest anti-gun laws in the nation.
And it’s also soft on criminals at a time when people need tougher law enforcement the most.