Wednesday, July 31, 2024

Stationed for Success


I got published in the current Aug/Sept issue of the bimonthly
Our Wisconsin magazine. This past January the editor sent me an email asking if I would be interested in writing a story about my old Clark gas station days in Milwaukee. I submitted about 1400 words, he liked it and allotted two pages for it. They edited it down to about 900 words to fit. The original manuscript is shown immediately below, with the edited final magazine publication following. I think the editor did an excellent job.

Stationed for Success (Original Manuscript)

Clark Oil was the Wisconsin innovator of modern mini-mart gas stations!

By Daniel S. Bridger

Early in February, we were escaping the Wisconsin winter in Gulf Shores, Alabama and pulled into a Murphy USA gas station to fuel. The station was busy as I navigated around the lot to find an open pump. Noticing, as I put my card in, only one hose and one type of fuel was dispensed at that pump, ethanol-free 93 octane premium. Since that was what I wanted, it was perfect. It also got me thinking about my Wisconsin Clark Oil days as a service station attendant while in high school and later on, a franchised Clark dealer throughout the1970’s into the 1980s.

The founder of Clark Oil, Emory T. Clark, was a building contractor in Milwaukee who built a gas station at 60th and Greenfield in 1932. The owner could not pay and he had to take possession of the property. Emory ran that station very successfully and started expanding throughout the years to over 1400 stations across the midwest by the 1980’s. Up until the early 1970’s Clark only sold premium gasoline. Selling the finest gas at a fair price, with exceptionally quick service was their forte. The stations were also radically different from the standard industry model that combined gasoline sales with mechanical auto service and repair. Clark stations did not have service bays, and had much smaller buildings with expansive (many with floor to ceiling) windows. Dealers could display convenience items that customers could see while the full service attendants were fueling their cars and cleaning windows.

A substantial percent of profits also came from tobacco sales. Racks of cigarettes enclosed in cabinets were fastened to the outside pump islands where attendants could grab what the customer ordered and hand to them at their car window. Attendants wore coin changers on their belts and had a wad of cash in their pocket to make change without having to run inside. In good weather, I would have a small table out between the fuel islands with a credit card imprinter to quickly handle credit sales. Many customers not needing fuel would drive in for fast and easy “carhop” service, with Clark becoming their primary go-to place to obtain smokes. During the late 1960’s an effort was made to introduce more and more convenience items such as ice, milk, soda and snack items like chips, Twinkies and HoHos. Of course, standard auto needs like oil, anti-freeze, window wash, snow brushes, etc were also available. Clark had their own brand of stamps, which customers would paste into a book and redeem for cash when full. Tuesdays were always the slowest day of the week for gasoline sales so Clark would offer double stamps on that day to increase sales volume.

I was a very fortunate fellow to come across Clark Oil and Refining in my teenage years. My buddy Ross had a job with a franchised dealer at Hopkins and Silver Spring in Milwaukee. Being only 16 years old in 1969, I had a summer job working at a small steel fabricating shop. It didn’t take long for me to realize I wasn’t cut out for that kind of work and my boss knew also, which resulted in me being fired. I was desperate to find something I could do to make money, so I asked Ross if he could get me an interview with Chuck Oleson, who was the Clark dealer. After going to see him, he said the only opening he had was for a third shift attendant. There were only two weeks before my senior high school year began, but he told me if I could cover it until school started and did a good job, he would work me part time during my last two semesters. My first couple nights starting my 10pm shift, Ross agreed to stay with me for a couple hours of training. I remember struggling and getting panicky the first few times making change for customers as I tried to subtract in my head the purchase price from the amount they gave me. Ross would say “Count up from the purchase price!”. It was so much easier, I had it figured out in less than an hour. Hooray! I made it through the first two weeks, although I got ripped off by a slick quick change artist on my last night before school started. I knew that guy got me for something and sure enough, I was $20 short checking out. But Chuck understood and kept me onboard. 

My first Milwaukee winter working outdoors fueling cars was certainly a challenge! But, they taught me some tricks of the trade, like making certain to have at least two pairs of decent work gloves. There were electric heaters in the station for heat and we would put one pair on the heater while outside pumping fuel. When our hands were nearly frozen stiff, we would race inside and exchange gloves to keep going. And, of course, we were always seriously busy the colder the weather!  

And that’s how it started, I found a job that I didn’t hate doing and things were looking much better. I needed money to indulge my passion, which was driving and I had to pay for gas to do it! My dad handed off the old family car to me after he bought another but I was responsible for maintenance and the cost of operating it. Chuck was an absolutely great man to work for and I owe him so much. After nearly two years, he unselfishly recommended to Clark Oil that I would be a good candidate to get my own station, becoming a franchised dealer.

That came to be at the end of 1971 when I signed a lease with Clark Oil for the station at Santa Monica and Hampton Ave in Milwaukee. In those days you could become a franchised gasoline dealer with Clark for about $3,000. That included a $1000 security deposit as well as funds to pay for inventory. I would order gasoline by the truckload and have 10 days to remit payment. Being 19 years old when I took over the station, I certainly did not have that kind of cash and the banks had refused to even consider me. My parents didn’t have the extra cash either but an uncle lent me the money and I repaid it faithfully at $180 per month.

My career with Clark Oil lasted until 1982 and ended after I had moved to northern Wisconsin and into a new career as a truck driver. Emory T. Clark sold the company in 1981 to Apex Oil, dying in 1984 at the age of 78 from cancer. Apex and subsequent owners failed to keep up with the changing store designs and layout needed for the newer self-service station operating models and went through some pretty rough years, being sold off numerous times. The company is now known as Clark Brands and still owns a refinery in Illinois.

All in all, my experience with Clark had such a positive effect on my life. As a high school graduate without much life experience, I learned by watching, while also making mistakes along the way. The experience gained in running a business, bookkeeping and accounting principles, employee, customer and vendor relations helped me immensely later in life. Working for Chuck was great because he hired so many excellent employees that have become lifelong friends. Chuck knew how to handle people and his employees worked hard for him because they liked and respected him. He helped not only me but four other of his employees get their own stations. Unfortunately Chuck Oleson passed away too early in 2015. He was a great example for me and a man that helped me become a better person.












Tuesday, June 4, 2024

How I Switched to Starlink for a Net Increase of Only $24.00 Per Month!

We bought our current house in 2020 and suffered through three years of misery with CenturyLink (now Brightspeed) internet. I won’t go through the whole drawn out story of this company having the worst customer service that I have ever encountered. Just suffice to say, the company advertised my area had 25 Mbps available, then said I could only get 10 Mbps and was provided a max of 6 Mbps. And that was on the best day, most of the time, during the day and on week-ends, there were constant service interruptions. Very rarely could I even think about streaming a movie until after 6 or 7 PM. Our DSL internet and landline phone cost about $70, which wasn’t bad, except the internet was just about useless.

I was on the waitlist for Starlink for quite a few months when they raised the monthly rate from $90 to $120 just as service became available in my area. I canceled the order and waited some more. Finally in August last year I was so fed up I told myself “to hell with it” and ordered it again. One of the best decisions I ever made and it didn’t cost as much as I thought!


While the equipment cost is substantial at $600, you own it and can resell at will, and, I believe you have time to return it for a full refund if not satisfied with the service. The monthly $120 dollar service seems pricey but here’s what I did. I had an unlimited data plan and hotspot on my cell phone for only one reason. That was to have the internet at home when Brightspeed was down, which was so frequently, it was beyond belief. I was paying $55 per month and switched to a $35 plan. Starlink is a month to month service which you pay by credit card on file and you can suspend or cancel service at any time, for any reason. There are no taxes or extra fees other than the $120 monthly charge. Since I get 5% cash back on my credit card, my actual cost is $114 monthly.


So, I canceled our landline and DSL internet saving $70. The only calls we got on landline were scammers anyway. My cell phone plan change saved another $20 per month, so my total savings was $90. Starlink dollars out of pocket is $114 minus the $90 saved equals a net cost increase of $24.00! And if I could convince my significant other to switch her cell phone to a cheaper plan, the household savings would be even greater, maybe close to the same previous cost!


And how is Starlink working? In the 10 months we’ve had it there’s been one 22 minute outage that occurred other than any standard utility power outage from storms. The router and internet will go down if the power goes out, but I solved that problem by getting a UPS battery backup with integrated surge protector for it. My download speeds are consistently well above 50 Mbps with uploads above 20Mbps. More than enough to do anything online without any issues. Of course if you have access to fiber or cable internet, that would be worth considering, but for us rural areas, Starlink is great. It’s sure made me a happier person!


Other Post Links:

Directv-or-Dish-which-is-better?




Sunday, February 25, 2024

21 Years of Stupid

Caption: After selling all the gasoline he was allocated for Novemebr, Daniel Bridger Thursday put up this sign and closed his service station until his new quota begins. Brigder's station is at 4751 N. Santa Monica Blvd. - Sentinel photo by Ron Overdahl

In 1973, OPEC cut off oil sales to the US and the west because of our support for Israel. I was a franchised Clark station dealer at the time. On Nov 30th, the Milwaukee Sentinel published a reporter’s photograph of my station being temporarily closed for lack of fuel. The second image shows the front page headline of that morning’s same newspaper. Little did I know the future consequences of what was about to happen.


Those events began a miserable 13 years of the insane national 55 mph speed limit. My livelihood was severely affected by the sporadic gasoline deliveries as well as my employees’ income, so I had a "dog in the fight”. What followed was a ridiculous national mandate by the federal government put in place by the Nixon administration. The law was widely ignored nationwide until many jurisdictions discovered a goldmine with fines/citations as a major source of revenue. Speed traps galore sprang up as a result. Those common sense states that refused to enforce the national speed limit were threatened by the Carter administration in 1977 with the loss of highway funding if they didn’t fall in line. The law was proven to be almost useless as far as conservation and soon took a back seat to the enormous revenue stream. Many fed up citizens avoided traveling on the safer limited access highways to run the back roads and avoid speed traps. The actual fuel savings computed by the federal government? Between 0.5 and 1%! This injustice dragged on until 1987 when they relented by raising it to 65 mph on certain limited access rural highways, finally repealing it altogether in 1995 after 21 years. 


So that's how it began.

I was incensed, feeling like we were being punished due to the US failure to protect our national interest and security. President Nixon actually first proposed a national 50 mph speed limit for motor vehicles and 55 mph for trucks. Of course POTUS would never have to cross Montana or Texas by car at 50 mph! By the time of Jimmy Carter’s 1977 crackdown, in my mid 20’s, I had become a militant “professional speeder”. With a progression of radar detectors starting with an Escort, then Passport, and eventually a Valentine One and CB radios, the war was ongoing. My mission was to travel using a reasonable speed based on weather and traffic conditions. Most of the time that highway speed was quite a bit above the “double nickel” that President Carter demanded we should travel. Note: I was reasonable, not reckless.


It was years before I even considered driving as a profession. Although I had numerous close calls with various Smokey Bears, Sheriff's deputies and "local yokels", I was able to maintain a reasonably clean driver's license which fortunately enabled me to pursue truck driving as a career a few years later.


I have long believed that using the decades old, scientific, "85th percentile rule" in setting speed limits was and should remain the national policy. I long ago sold my last radar detector because of the much more sensible speed laws in most states. But, alas, there is an ongoing movement underway by the “nanny state” trying to discredit the 85th percentile policy. Please support the National Motorists Association, a non-profit that advocates for the motoring public. You can Google them online if you wish to join or link here. National Motorists Association Newsletters are free to sign up for.





Sunday, October 29, 2023

The True Cost of Electric Vehicles

First-of-kind analysis reveals true cost of owning, operating EVs without govt. subsidies

October 25, 2023 | by 

Article thanks to Vivek Saxena and American Wire News Service. Link to the original follows below: 

A study by a conservative think tank has determined that electric vehicles would cost oodles more if it weren’t for all the subsidies.

The study from the Texas Public Policy Foundation (TPPF) found, for example, that the average 2021 electric vehicle “would cost $48,698 more to own over a 10-year period without $22 billion in government favors given to EV manufacturers and owners.”

“EV advocates claim that the cost of electricity for EV owners is equal to $1.21 per gallon of gasoline (Edison Electric Institute, 2021), but the cost of charging equipment and charging losses, averaged out over 10 years and 120,000 miles, is $1.38 per gallon equivalent on top of that. Adding the costs of the subsidies to the true cost of fueling an EV would equate to an EV owner paying $17.33 per gallon of gasoline,” the report reads.

“And these estimates do not include the hundreds of billions more in subsidies in the Inflation Reduction Act (2022) for various aspects of the EV supply chain, particularly for battery manufacturing. It is not an overstatement to say that the federal government is subsidizing EVs to a greater degree than even wind and solar electricity generation and embarking on an unprecedented endeavor to remake the entire American auto industry,” it continues.

Yet, the report notes, the public’s response to this endeavor has been “tepid” primarily because most Americans can’t afford the upfront (not to mention the long-term) costs of an electric vehicle.

“Car lots are swelling with unsold EVs (Muller, 2023), and the Ford Motor Company is losing over $70,000 on each EV it currently sells,” the report notes.

The report’s overarching goal is “to analyze how regulatory credits, hidden costs, and subsidies disguise the real cost of electric vehicles (EVs).”

“With the Biden administration’s continued push for electrification and states such as California implementing laws to ban the sale of gas-powered cars by 2035, ‘Overcharged Expectations: Unmasking the True Costs of Electric Vehicles’ reveals the regulatory tricks at play and how these costs are socialized on to taxpayers and gas vehicle owners. This study was also submitted as part of a public comment on the National Highway Transportation Safety Administration’s proposed fuel economy standards,” a press release from TPPF states.

The press release also includes a statement from the report’s author, Jason Isaac.

“The Biden administration and leftist states such as California have pushed for widespread electrification in less than 20 years through government subsidies and coercive regulations, but the price you see in the lot is not the true cost of an electric vehicle,” he said.

“Electric vehicle owners have been the beneficiaries of regulatory credits, subsidies, and socialized infrastructure costs totaling nearly 50 thousand dollars per EV. These costs are borne by gasoline vehicle owners, taxpayers, and utility ratepayers, who are all paying a hefty price for someone else’s EV,” he added.

The report also found that electric vehicles receive roughly 7x more in federal fuel efficiency credits than they actually provide in fuel economy benefits.

Also, the report determined that electric vehicle charging stations will cost roughly $11,833 per electric vehicle every 10 years — costs that will have to be shouldered by taxpayers, regardless of whether they personally own an EV.

In conclusion, the report argued that “the true cost” of an electric vehicle is light years ahead of the cost of a traditional vehicle.

“The stark reality for proponents of EVs and for the dreamers in the federal government, who are using fuel economy regulations to force manufacturers to produce ever more EVs, is that the true cost of an EV is in no way close to a comparable [internal combustion engine vehicle (ICEV)],” the report reads.

“Without increased and sustained government favors, EVs will remain more expensive than ICEVs for many years to come. Hence why, even with these subsidies, EVs have been challenging for dealers to sell and why basic economic realities indicate that the Biden administration’s dream of achieving 100% EVs by 2040 will never become a reality,” it continues.

According to Fox News, the report’s publication comes as Democrats on both the federal and state levels continue to attack gas-powered vehicles while promoting EVs.

“Biden has set a goal of ensuring 50% of all car sales are zero-emissions by 2030 and his administration has pursued rigorous restrictions on gas-powered vehicles,” Fox News notes.

Most recently, the Biden administration announced new emissions rules that “are significantly more stringent and … cover a wider range of heavy-duty engine operating conditions compared to today’s standard,” as reported by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

The problem, according to truckers like JKC Trucking co-owner Mike Kucharski, is that the new rules could bankrupt truckers and thus destroy America’s supply chain.

Appearing on Fox News’ “Fox & Friends” last month, he explained that the “regulations are not practical and impossible for five reasons,” including the fact that “the costs are astronomical” and “truckers will not be able to afford these things.”

“A new clean diesel long haul tractor typically costs in the range of $180,000 to $200,000. A comparable battery electric tractor costs upwards of $480,000. That’s about a $300,000 upcharge, [which] is cost prohibitive for the overwhelming majority of motor carriers,” he said in a separate statement to Fox News.

Link to the original article posted by American Wire is below:

True Cost of Owning/operating EVs






Saturday, May 13, 2023

Remembering Sox & Martin at Union Grove

I believe it was the summer of 1967 when my best friend Tom and I were both 15 years old. We didn’t possess driver’s licenses yet, but we were rabid car guys. Tom’s dad had a Ford and my dad a 1957 Chrysler with a 392 hemi in it. Of course, I was a big Mopar fan while my buddy was loyal to Ford. The Sox & Martin race team and Don Garlits were my drag racing heroes.
We lived in Milwaukee, Wi and my dad agreed to take us to The Great Lakes Dragaway in Union Grove, Wi for the Olympics of Drag Racing contest one Sunday afternoon. Sox & Martin were running Super Stock that year in a 1967 Plymouth Barracuda, I believe.
We had pretty good seats fairly close to the starting line as Ronnie pulled up to stage for his first race. I don’t remember who he was racing against but when the green lit up, Ronnie came off the line pulling a huge wheelie while getting a holeshot on his challenger. He came right by us with the front wheels off the ground and in the lead as I jumped up from my seat and yelled “holy f**k!” I was between my dad and Tom when he (Tom) elbowed me in the side to shut up. I then realized in horror what I said and was afraid my dad was going to kill me, but he didn’t say anything. I’m sure he heard me and must have decided to let it go, but I was so embarrassed.
I believe they won the Super Stock title that week-end. It was pretty exciting for us two kids dreaming of getting our licenses soon! Ronnie Sox died of cancer at age 67 in 2006, I think Buddy Martin is in his late 80’s now.