Friday, September 28, 2018

Q&A: Finn Murphy, Truck Owner-Operator and Author of 'The Long Haul'

Article thanks to Jack Roberts and truckinginfo.com. Links provided:
Aug 16, 2018  Finn Murphy has been around trucking and the moving van business since he was a teenager in Greenwich, Connecticut, in the 1970s. As soon as he was able, he was behind the wheel of a tractor-trailer relocating families all across the United States. He’s seen a lot of changes in his three decades behind the wheel. And a few years back, he decided to write a book about his experiences.
The Long Haul is the result of that decision, a gritty look at trucking and “bed bugging” that earned positive reviews from the New York Times and USA Today, among other publications. The book is partly a nostalgic memoir, partly a honest look at the hard lives truckers lead, and partly a commentary on a society and economy that either marginalize or ostracize the men and women that literally keep America rolling.
HDT recently caught up with Murphy in between trips to talk about his book, technology, and the state of trucking in the modern age.
HDT: What made you decide to write a book about your experiences as a trucker?
Murphy: It all started back in the 1980s. I carried this little cassette tape recorder around with me, and I started relaying interesting things that happened to me during the day as a kind of stress reliever. And then I started talking into it while I was driving. And eventually I was recording my interactions with shippers and my helpers. And one winter, I took a break and had all of these recordings transcribed. And I ended up with about 700 pages of stuff. And I started looking through it and realized I had a lot of good material for a book about life on the road. So I started writing.
HDT: When it was done and time to shop it around, was there interest in a mainstream book on trucking?
Murphy: I got an agent, and initially, he wasn’t interested. But after a lot of back and forth, I finally convinced him to shop it around. He pitched it to six different publishers – and they all wanted it! So that was nice. We finally went with Norton in New York. They put their top editor on the manuscript. Plus, they paid me in advance and set me up on a book tour. So it was nice.
HDT: What’s a book tour for a trucking book like?
Murphy: It was actually two book tours. We did the first one like you’d expect: Flying around the country, doing radio interviews and signing books. But then I had an idea: We covered my trailer with a vinyl wrap of my book cover and I went on a driving tour across the country for three months promoting the book in the usual way and at truck stops. And that was great because I got to talk to a lot of different people – but also more truck drivers.
HDT: After 30-plus years in this industry, what are your thoughts on where trucking has come from, and where it is today?
Murphy: Ah, man – that’s a huge question that we could talk about all day! But, the first thing I’d say is that trucking used to be a middle-class profession. That was the case when I started in 1980. And the industry was generally populated by men from the South and the Midwest who either grew up in towns with manufacturing jobs that didn’t pay very well, or on farms. In many cases, they grew up in trucking families. But they knew they didn’t want to work on a farm or in a factory and they saw trucking as a good way to support their families.
That’s one part of it. Then, things kind of get mythologized a bit. You had a two-tier industry in those days – regulated freight haulers, and unregulated ag haulers. And most of the ag haulers were owner-operators. So this trucking culture grew up based on those guys and the wildcat drivers in the 1940s and 1950s. They created this “Cowboy” myth of the American trucker. They hit the road, made decent money, supported their families and got to see the country.
Today, the average age of a long-haul driver is 55 years old. Very few young people want into trucking. To them, it just looks like a bad job. And the problem is, they’re right. Most truckers today make between $36,000 and $42,000 a year. Which is nothing. Moreover, most of them get paid by the mile. So they’re not getting paid waiting around truck stops for a load, waiting around a loading dock for freight, or when they’re sitting in traffic. All told, you’ve got drivers today who really work something like 3,000 to 4,000 hours a year. And when you break it down, that’s not even $15 an hour.
HDT: You’ve driven a lot of trucks in your career. What do you drive these days?
Murphy: I’m driving a new, 2018 Freightliner Cascadia Evolution with a 436-cubic-inch Detroit under the hood. I’ve got a double-loft sleeper, ‘fridge, microwave oven, Bluetooth – lots of little tweaks to make my life as comfortable as possible while I’m out. The Cascadia is a nice workhorse of a truck. If you’re a driver in business for yourself, it’s a great truck. Other companies build great trucks – they all do. But I’m not interested in paying for chrome and lights and things like that. I run household goods. So I’m usually running about 70,000 lbs. So I’m not super heavy. I do a lot of mountain driving, and that Detroit will take me right up those steep mountain grades at 55 mph without any trouble. I don’t speed. I don’t get paid by the mile, so I don’t need to. I haven’t had a ticket in 30 years.
HDT: What about fuel economy and safety features?
Murphy: I buy my own fuel. So fuel economy is important to me. My last truck got about 5.5 mpg. This Cascadia gets 7.7 mpg. So that’s a nice break. And I like all the safety features on the truck. Drivers don’t talk much about safety. But to tell the truth, I get scared out there a lot between sudden rainstorms, mountain grades, other cars and so forth. When I was on my book tour, I met this retired Walmart driver. He had 5 million accident-free miles. I asked him how he accomplished that. He said he always went slow and tried to anticipate what was going to happen around him, and what could go wrong if it did. I think that’s good advice for any driver.
HDT: What do you think about all the technology that’s coming into trucking now?
Murphy: I was talking to the safety director at the company I’m contracted to now, and he said that when the first GPS navigation systems came along, his drivers got lost three times more often than they did using a road atlas. And they got into more trouble too, going down one-way streets or getting caught in low overpasses – because they weren’t internalizing routes or really even paying attention. They were just following instructions. So technology can cut both ways, if you’re not careful. For me, those systems are incredibly valuable, because I go to private residences, and not just terminal to terminal.
HDT: What about autonomous vehicles – self-driving trucks?
Murphy: I talk to guys all the time who tell me it’ll never happen – or it’s 20 years down the way, or something. But I see Apple, Tesla, GM, Ford, Toyota and all these other companies spending billions of dollars and racing each other to be first with autonomous technology – there’s no it’s not going to happen. People don’t know it, but they’ve logged more than 22 million road miles on Class 8 trucks under autonomous control in this country already. So I think it’s imminent. I think we’ll start seeing the first models in under three years. I mean, we have 41,000 people killed in road accidents every year. And doesn’t include injuries and property damage. I think my grandkids will look back on us in amazement that we were allowed to drive automobiles and trucks. They will probably live in a world where it’s illegal to drive an automobile because they’re so dangerous. They’ll look at driving a car the way we look at driving a horse and buggy, or something.
HDT: What about electric trucks?
Murphy: I thought the Tesla Semi launch was pretty amusing. [Elon] Musk said he was directing that truck at owner-operators. And that’s hilarious: First, off they aren’t any owner-operators left. And among those that are still out there, who’s got $380,000 to buy a truck? And if you don’t have a fleet terminal to go to every night, where are you going to plug the thing in?
HDT: In your book I found your description of the little cliques and hierarchy that drivers have to be pretty interesting. For example, you’re a “bed bugger…”
Murphy: I was having a bit of fun with that. It’s not serious. But I get ribbed for being a “bed bugger,” and I’ll say that freight haulers just sit in truck stops and drink coffee all day. It’s fun. Humans in general have always sort of established hierarchies in groups. But if it’s 3 a.m. in the mountains and we’re on the side of the road thawing our brakes out with flares or trying to get chains on our tires, we’re all brothers.
HDT: Truck driver is the number one job in many states today. So many families depend on trucking for their livelihood, and the country depends on trucking to keep the economy going. And yet, truckers get no respect. Why do you think that is?
Murphy: Somebody said something the other day that really resonated with me: If you don’t like all these trucks crowding around you on the road, stop buying stuff! But you know, I wish people were more thoughtful about truck drivers. Every one of us represents the driving community out there. So if there’s a cowboy running loose out there, it reflects on all of us. But most of us aren’t like that. We’re just Americans with family lives, emotional lives and aspirations, just like anyone else. We want to be part of the economy. We’re not a bunch of crazy cowboys. We’re hard-working Americans doing a tough job – and many of us are making shit money for doing it.
HDT: What’s next for you?
Murphy: I’m writing another book. So that’s interesting. And I’m at home today in Colorado – but I’m out the door tomorrow; back out on the road on another trip.



Saturday, September 22, 2018

Waste oil truck driver arrested for illegal dumping says he was following company orders

abcactionnews.com
Article thanks to Tom Quimby and hardworkingtrucks.com. Links provided:
Aug, 2018  No one questions the arrest of used cooking oil truck driver Peter Rodriguez for illegal dumping.
The problem now is in determining what it was that he actually left behind on a vacant, tree-filled lot in Central Florida last week and if he was following company orders as he attests.
Last Tuesday, the Polk County Sheriff’s Office reported that Rodriguez, 50, was arrested for dumping 10,000 gallons of used cooking oil onto a corner lot in Davenport owned by Walgreens and Duke Energy, according to the Miami Herald.
Rodriguez, who was charged with two counts of felony commercial dumping, later told authorities that he didn’t dump cooking oil, but rather a worthless sludge-like substance that’s produced from processing used cooking oil.
He says that material came from his employer, Brownie’s Septic & Plumbing, which runs a used cooking oil refining plant in Orlando about 25 miles northeast of Davenport. Rodriguez said he was following company orders when he dumped the substance.
“The suspect stated that he knew it was wrong, but had to do it to keep his job and feed his family,” a Polk County Sheriff’s Office arrest report reads.
Representatives from Brownie’s visited the lot and told authorities that the substance there resembled used cooking oil.
“The representatives stated that it does not make sense because that’s how they make their money and referred to it as ‘liquid gold,’” the arrest report states.
Depending on how it’s processed, used cooking oil is used to produce biodiesel and renewable diesel. Rodriguez told authorities that he was paid to deliver used cooking oil to Brownie’s processing plant in Orlando. However, this time he said he had orders to dispose sludge from the plant. Rodriguez lives about two-and-a-half miles away from the lot.
Whatever the substance is, ACT Environmental is calling it Polk County’s largest waste spill. Polk’s Fire Rescue Hazmat team and the Florida Department of Environment Protection also responded to the scene which is across the street from a CVS pharmacy and a Publix supermarket.


Wednesday, September 19, 2018

Commentary: The Fatal Uber Crash Revisited


komando.com
Article thanks to Rolf Lockwood and truckinginfo.com. Links provided:
I take it back. Way back. In my May column I wrote about the Arizona fatality in March involving an Uber vehicle in autonomous mode. The facts were “a bit sketchy,” I admitted, but suggested that “in a sense they don’t matter. It’s about the optics.”
Well, it certainly was about the optics in the larger context of social acceptance in the autonomous world. And they were undeniably bad, even though it was the first fatal accident involving what people call a ‘robot’ vehicle.
“I’d venture a guess that autonomy actually has little to do with this accident, that nothing could have prevented the woman’s death,” I wrote back in May. “There simply wasn’t time for any reaction, human or otherwise.”
But there actually was time, apparently, according to a 300-page report released by the Tempe Police Department in late June. And in fact the report blames the crash on distracted driving. Sound familiar?
To remind you of the circumstances, the Uber vehicle — a Volvo XC90 SUV — was doing 44 mph on a multi-lane roadway at night, apparently in Level Four autonomous mode, and simply failed to “see” Elaine Herzberg crossing the road while walking her bicycle. She was not at a crosswalk, jaywalking in other words. A so-called “backup” human driver — Rafaela Vasquez — was present, though not actively driving. Worse than that, the police report says the driver was watching ‘The Voice’ on a cell phone, and in the 20 minutes or so before the crash, her eyes were off the road some 32% of the time.
The driver in this case, and it’s clear in a video the police released on Twitter,  saw the woman crossing the road only half a second before impact. The car did not brake at all.
FreightWaves, in an interview with Brad Moore, Director of Communications and Media Relations for Central New Mexico Community College noted that CNM is at “the intersection of I-25 and I-40 in the heart of Albuquerque, two highly traveled trucking routes,” making it an ideal spot for training the next generation of drivers. According to Moore, CNM has long offered a “college-credit truck driving certificate program that takes 12 to 15 weeks to complete, as well as contract training for local trucking companies that wanted one-on-one, accelerated training opportunities for their prospective drivers.”
By 2015, CNM was receiving more demand for “accelerated training that wouldn’t require a trucking company or individual to provide the vehicle,” and by fall 2016, “CNM Ingenuity, an arm of CNM that offers accelerated training programs in high-demand fields, received approval to use one of the Class A vehicles from the college’s traditional semester-long program for one-on-one trainings. The response to this type of training was very positive and led to significantly higher demand for accelerated training opportunities, with little to no marketing. That led to the planning of the new accelerated program,” Moore explained.
As for appealing to younger drivers, Moore estimates that 80% of inquiries about the new program have been from millennials, and that their first group of students has already started hitting the books. “The first cohort of the accelerated program started on July 9 with five participants. A new cohort of six to nine students will now start every four weeks. The August cohort is nearly full. In the fall, we plan to begin running two cohorts a day to meet demand,” Moore stated.
“Since announcing the launch of this program, we have received a tremendous response from trucking companies and people in our community who want to become truck drivers and earn a good living,” said Kyle Lee, chief executive officer of CNM Ingenuity. “As a community college, this is exactly what we strive to do – educate and train community members for quality jobs that serve the needs of our regional economy.”


Saturday, September 15, 2018

A driver wins his lawsuit, and the award is so small his lawyers can barely get paid

Article thanks to John Kingston and freightwaves.com. Links provided:
July, 2018  It must have been an exciting day last December for truck driver David Couch. His lawsuit against Randall Rents of Florida, which rents industrial equipment, had come in from the jury and he was a winner.
Couch had refused to drive a truck because he thought it was unsafe. As a result, he was dismissed. He filed suit claiming his rights had been violated under the Florida laws governing what it describes as "whistleblowing."
The jury agreed. It awarded Couch damages. The amount? A whopping $4,720.
And now the case drags on in court, because the lawyers want to get compensated, and taking a piece out of $4,720 doesn't pay for much.
That's why the legal filings in the case continue to fly, long after the case was adjudicated. FreightWaves sent emails to the lawyers involved, but heard no response. Still, there are enough legal documents to piece together what happened in the case where the requested legal fees are many times the amount of the award.
(Not to get political but it spurs memories of one of the first significant legal battles where the public met Donald Trump, back in the mid 80’s. Massive sums were spent on an antitrust battle between the United States Football League and the NFL, and the USFL, led by New Jersey Generals' owner Trump, won the case. The award? One dollar, tripled because it was an antitrust case. A terrific book was written about it.)
According to one of the documents in the case, Couch joined Randall in January 2014 and "performed his job in an exemplary manner, and had only received positive remarks and reviews from his superiors."

A "shimmy sound"

Toward the end of his time there, according to the document, he complained to management that there was a "shimmy sound" coming from the front of his truck, and that his transmission was the likely source of the sound.
An inspection of the truck was scheduled, but before it could take place, Couch was told to drive to Gainesville, Florida "with the faulty and dangerous truck." The trip would be about 600 miles round trip.
"At this time, (Couch) refused to do the trip as...he believed it would be dangerous to send out a knowingly faulty vehicle that type of distance," the document said. He refused to go on the trip and was fired.
According to the original lawsuit, Couch's activity was protected under various Florida statutes known as the Florida Whistle-Blower Act, as well as laws regarding the operation of a vehicle known to be dangerous. Couch and his attorneys asked that the court declare that Randall's acts had violated the Whistle Blower Act; that back pay and other financial considerations be paid, including "compensatory and consequential damages"; and that Couch be awarded "reasonable attorney's fees" and other legal costs.
In the two-page jury verdict, the jury answered “yes” to the following questions:
--"Do you find that the Plaintiff (Couch) objected to, or refused to participate in, conduct that Plaintiff reasonably believed would be a violation of Florida Statutes 316.610 and 316.6105? (Those statues involve knowingly operating a vehicle that the driver knows or believes is unsafe).”
--"Do you find that the Plaintiff's termination was causally connected to his objection to, or refusal to participate in, conduct that Plaintiff reasonably believe would be a violation of (the safety statutes)?”
A "no" answer was then provided to the following question: "Do you find that the Defendant (Randall) provided a legitimate, non-retaliatory reason for terminating the Plaintiff?”
The final question on the jury sheet: “Should the Plaintiff be awarded damages to compensate for loss of wages and benefits from the date of termination to the date of new employment?” The yes box is checked. On the line where the compensation is requested, there's the number; $4,720. There is no explanation why the amount was so relatively small.
In the instructions to the jury, the judge said a finding in favor of Couch should consider "the following elements" in setting the size of the award: the difference between lost wages and benefits to the date of the trial (the trial was in November-December 2017, and Couch was fired in May 2015); any wages to be lost in the future; and any "emotional pain and mental anguish."
A court did order in early January that an additional $25,000 in legal fees be paid by Randall to the attorneys for Couch for costs incurred up until the decision in the case, as well as about $5,350 to Couch himself for expenses he incurred.
But with the attorneys not viewing that amount as adequate, the litigation goes on. Legal documents continue to fly back-and-forth between Couch’s and Randall’s attorneys, leading to the conclusion that the monetary value of the hours being spent on the after-case by both sides’ attorneys might end up being equal in value to the size of any award.  
As for the size of those requested awards, attorney Chad Levy is asking approximately $40,300; David Cozad just a touch under $3,000; and Evan Krakower $25,150.
Round the total up to $70,000. Even if you ignore the roughly $30,000 awarded in January to the attorneys and Couch, it means the court award is about 7% of the legal fees now being contested.


Wednesday, September 12, 2018

How Not to Hate Your Diesel Particulate Filter

searchautoparts.com
Article thanks to Les Smart and truckinginfo.com. Links provided:
July, 2018  We all know by now that the mandated 2007 and 2010 emissions standard rules radically changed on-highway diesel-powered trucks and tractors. To reduce emissions to satisfy the Environmental Protection Agency-mandated level of soot and NOx, engines needed to add technology to meet the new standards.
As a result, the infamous diesel particulate filter (DPF) came into being in 2007, and diesel exhaust fluid (DEF) was introduced in 2010 into the exhaust stream to reduce particulates and NOx. While this change was a benefit to the environment, the introduction of both brought tales of woe from truck owners regarding the added expense, maintenance, and failures. 

The DPF’s Job

The sole intention of the DPF is to catch and retain particulates, or “soot” in layman’s language. The DPF requires periodic soot removal cycles, termed “regeneration” or “regen” for short. These regens burn the accumulated soot out of the DPF at extremely high temperatures. Most of these “passive” regens occur almost unnoticed at highway speeds. 
While the filter burns off soot at speed, soot will accumulate during idling or slow traffic. Trucks that don’t accumulate a lot of mileage, those in extended idle periods such as stop-and-go duty cycles in urban environments, or stationary power take off (PTO) applications may require the driver to commence an active, or manual regen. 
Regens are generally accomplished by activating a switch on the dash of the truck. An active regen takes approximately 20 minutes, depending upon how clogged the DPF is. When a regen is commenced manually, the vehicle should be parked and away from buildings, brush, people, and animals.  
This should be the only maintenance necessary on the DPF system in the first 100,000 to 150,000 driving miles. However, if high idling occurs regularly during the duty cycle, regens will be more frequent.
Teach your drivers to pull over in a safe place and park if a manual regen is required. Hopefully, your duty cycles will have the truck doing automatic regens all or most of the time. 

Keep it Clean 

According to Dan Whittle, service manager for Cumberland Trucks, an international dealer serving Tennessee with its headquarters in Nashville, the following issues will cause premature clogging of the DPF filter:
  • City driving with a light load
  • Stop-and-go traffic
  • Excessive use of engine brakes 
  • Inappropriate engine oil type: engines using non-low ash oil meeting the API performance classification CI-4/SL will retain soot and ash prematurely
  • Operator error
With operator error, there are many issues to consider. Failing to run an active regen when the truck asks for it, or interfering with the truck in any way that does not allow it to complete an active regen, will cause problems. Drivers need to know the difference between the exhaust temperature light and the DPF light. If the driver never sees the DPF light come on, that’s a good thing. This means the truck is doing what it is supposed to do. Whittle says drivers bring their trucks in for service because the DPF light never comes on.You’ll know when the truck needs a manual regen because the regen light will come on.
Do it — don’t bypass this, even temporarily. If your truck is equipped with a gauge in addition to a light, the gauge will progress from green to orange to red. Do not increase engine load after the regen light comes on, Whittle says. 
Manual regens should be run when the gauge is orange. By the time your gauge is in the red, you will be experiencing a power derating of the engine.

A Job for Professionals

There are plenty of truck components that can be serviced DIY — but a DPF is not one of them. Using shop air to blow off soot or ash will not clean the filter. Restoring a DPF to its optimal performance level is a science; specialized equipment is needed.
In terms of how often to service, it is essential to observe your truck’s published service interval. Severe duty cycles may increase the frequency of active regenerations, which is a good warning to service the DPF sooner than the published interval. 
Regarding where to service, the best course of action is to follow the truck manufacturer’s recommendation. Most truck dealers clean DPFs, though truck service centers and diesel emission service specialists also offer this service. 
Trucks can be brought in for servicing or the filter can be removed and brought in by itself. Other services offer pickup and delivery. Some DPF makers offer an exchange program in which dirty DPFs can be swapped for remanufactured clean ones. Consult your specific manufacturer first, as some manufacturers forbid component swapping, which will cause denial of a warranty claim. 
If you are looking into a third-party service to clean your filter, ask the provider if it warranties the cleaning and make sure to understand the details of the warranty. Some third parties work with franchised dealers. If so, call one of those dealers for a recommendation.
In general, exercise extreme caution if you’re thinking of having your DPF serviced by a third party. Going through your manufacturer’s franchised dealer, which typically charges about $200 to $500, is the safest way to ensure you won’t face any warranty issues if a faulty DPF causes damage to other components.
While that cost seems high, this cleaning can greatly extend the life of the component while reducing maintenance downtime and costs. This cost is relatively inexpensive when compared to the total cost of the vehicle when purchased. The DPF cleaning can also be combined with other scheduled service work to further minimize downtime.
During a dealer cleaning, a baseline reading is taken of the restriction of airflow through the filter using the air flow test bench. Most OEM filters have a baseline of what is considered acceptable air flow. If needed, the filter will be baked in a controlled cycle to burn any soot and convert it to ash. 
Once the DPF has gone through the cleaning process, its air flow is tested to ensure that it meets the manufacturer’s specs for a cleaned DPF. The DPF is then remounted on the truck. 
This process could take up to 90 minutes, though baking the filter could take up to eight hours. 

When to Clean

Trucks that make frequent stops combined with heavy-duty cycles will need their DPFs cleaned around 100,000 miles. Trucks with less severe duty cycles may wait until 150,000 to 200,000 miles. The specific use of your trucks will dictate when cleanings are necessary. 
Replacement of the DPF is much costlier than cleaning one. A new filter will cost more than $2,000; a used one can be had for $1,200 to $1,600. 
So, what’s the $64,000 answer as to how long my DPF will last in my service? I have seen Class 6 and Class 7 trucks with 6- or 7-liter engines regularly go up to 150,000 miles or more before needing to clean the DPF. Their ultimate life could be in the range of 250,000 miles.
Class 8 trucks with 12- to 15-liter engines should attain 250,000 miles and could go as long as 400,000 to 500,000 miles. The hours and mileage will vary, of course, depending upon your duty cycle. Using good, clean, low-ash diesel is a key to longevity.
Learn to appreciate having DPFs on your trucks. We all deserve to have cleaner air to breathe — especially our children and our grandchildren. 
About the Author
Les Smart is president of Smart Fleet Management, a small and medium fleet consulting company. He can be reached at smart5010@atlasok.com.