Wednesday, October 9, 2013

Safe pullovers

oregon.gov
Sometimes you see state troopers not thinking and taking unnecessary risks. Consider the following. Seems like a wise idea for the trucker being pulled over to put on his 4-ways and keep going until a safer place to pull over can be found! Article thanks to Dean Smallwood and ccjdigital.com Link provded below:

On a recent morning commute on the interstate, I was traveling in the far right lane and reached the top of a hill, where the road then turns to the right for a downhill run. At the top of the curving crest, I was greeted without warning with the sight of a state trooper – lights flashing – parked behind a tractor-trailer on the right side of the road. Both vehicles had been hidden by the natural terrain and weren’t visible until I was practically next to them. 
They’d parked at that perfect spot where they couldn’t be seen until the last possible second. Knowing full well that our state has a pull-over law where approaching traffic must yield a full lane for a law enforcement vehicle, I immediately jerked the wheel to provide space for the truck and trooper, who I noticed was standing on the truck’s steps talking to the truck driver.
After this brief moment passed, I started thinking about the situation. If this wasn’t a breakdown – and it didn’t appear to be – then why pull a truck over in an area with such poor visibility? Not only was this hazardous for approaching traffic, it was also dangerous for the trucker and trooper – after all, not every car in front of or behind me was obeying the pull-over law and was coming pretty darn close to both stopped vehicles.
In addition, consider how unsafe the truck’s return to the highway would be – the driver really didn’t have a good line of sight to determine if he would have enough time to re-enter the roadway before another car whizzing along at 70 mph would be underneath his trailer.
You’d think that considering the size of trucks and the speeding cars nearby, troopers might consider allowing big rigs to continue along until they reach a highly visible spot where a pullover will be safe for everyone – including themselves.
About Dean: I'm Dean Smallwood, managing editor of CCJ and Overdrive magazine. I'm responsible for handling production of the monthly CCJ and Overdrive print and digital editions. I have two decades-plus of journalism experience, with nearly half of that spent covering the transportation industry.
http://www.ccjdigital.com/safe-pullovers/?utm_source=daily&utm_medium=email&utm_content=08-06-2013&utm_campaign=CCJ&ust_id=137f89555c&

Sunday, October 6, 2013

Facing Fear, With Family, in the Sierra

Cottonwood Lakes, site of a campsite at about 10,000 feet.
Photo by Sean McKelvey
Article thanks to Tara McKelvey and travelnytimes.com. Link provided below:

9/5/2013  Standing on Old Army Pass, a trail in the Sierra Nevada in California, my brother Sean looked back at me and said we would have to scramble over boulders. “With exposure?” I asked, referring to the steepness of the rock face — and how far down it was to the bottom.
“Well, about a 500-foot drop,” he answered.
I tried not to think about it.
Like the Sierra Nevada itself, the five-and-a-half-mile-long Army Pass trail offers astonishing views, as well as the possibility you might plunge into an abyss. This was an unlikely vacation spot for someone who is afraid of heights. Yet when my oldest brother invited me and our other brother, Kerry, last year, I — who had never climbed anything more challenging than a steep staircase in New York — said yes.
Sean, 53, a telecommunications engineer and Navy veteran, has worked as a white-water river guide in the Pacific Northwest, gone on 100-mile bike rides and faced a mother bear and her cub at a campsite in California. Our goal for a four-day trip last July was to climb Mount Langley, a 14,026-foot peak that, according to Backpacker magazine, has one of the best alpine views in the country.
With stark walls and craggy cliffs, Langley and the Sierra Nevada embody the myth of the West, providing backdrops for Hopalong Cassidy B-Westerns and dozens of others, as well as adventure. From the summit, you can see the highest mountain in the contiguous United States, 14,505-foot-tall Whitney, as well as the Great Western Divide and Owens Valley, where the water wars immortalized in “Chinatown” unfolded.
Our first day, we parked at Horseshoe Meadow, an Inyo National Forest campsite where a sign reminds visitors: “This Place Is Wild.” Three people have died near Langley since 2009, including two who fell from Army Pass. Nationwide, 30 people died in mountaineering accidents last year, according to the Colorado-based American Alpine Club. Shortly before our trip, Michael Ybarra, a Wall Street Journal extreme-sports reporter who had written for The New York Times, was killed in the central Sierra when he fell from a cliff. I knew about the risks you face on a mountain, but I also knew we would play it safe.
Sean stabbed his pole in the dirt and started up the trail, followed by Kerry, a corporate executive, and me. Sean has a muscular build and knuckles so weather-beaten they look scarred. He also has a weakened shoulder, a stiff knee and gnarled wrist, from surgeries that were necessary after years of running and doing extreme sports.
The air had a rosemary-pine scent, and the trail was a well-marked path of dirt and sand. At various points, you cross over brooks, on logs or small bridges. The trail is not steep, but it is long — about five miles, and Sean had said it would take us three hours. It did not help when three-quarters of the way I began to slow down. Kerry, wearing ear buds, passed me. I discovered my ideal pace was the shuffle he had adopted minutes earlier while trying to fix his iPod, which was stuck on R.E.M.’s “Man on the Moon.”
Finally we reached Cottonwood Lakes, a campsite at about 10,000 feet, surrounded by forest and lakes, and set up tents. Later we saw a mule deer and met our neighbors, Max, a military contractor, and Tom, a surgeon. As Max and I filled water bottles at Long Lake, he told me he was planning to photograph the stars at night. The icy lake was deep and clear, and in the early evening I watched a marmot slip across the rocks near the campsite.
I woke in my tent at 2 a.m. and struggled to catch my breath. My throat was thick, and I swallowed hard. I was suffering from altitude sickness. After a few minutes, though, I made peace with the thin air and got some sleep.
Next morning, Sean fixed coffee on a portable stove, and our neighbor Tom stopped by: I gave him Band-Aids for his blisters in exchange for creamer, and then my brothers and I started up another section of the trail, a well-maintained path known as New Army Pass, part of which runs through Sequoia National Park.
It got colder as we climbed, and the terrain was desolate. We reached the top of the pass three hours later. While we were standing in a clearing, a guy in a faded T-shirt and torn pants emerged from behind a rock. He said a few jumbled words, and wandered off.
My brothers and I headed up a path marked by Stonehenge-like monuments and ran into scree and talus, which sound like the title of a Nickelodeon cartoon, but are diabolical. Talus are rocks that trip you, and scree is fine gravel that feels like quicksand. For every step you take in scree, you slide back a few inches. Sean’s boots scrunched to a halt about 500 feet from the summit. “Tara, there are rocks ahead,” he said. “We have to scramble up them.”
He wanted to forge ahead on a route that led to the top of the mountain, shinnying over boulders near a series of ledges. I was not interested in seeing more drop-offs — and potential falls. Yet I could tell by the sound of his voice that he was determined to get to the summit.
“You can go,” I said. “But what happens to me?”
“We just leave you here,” he said, with a laugh. He pointed to a clearing and said, “You should wait there instead of here.” I looked down and realized I was sitting on a rock at an elevation of about 13,500 feet; I scooted to the clearing.
My brothers continued up the trail, and I settled back and took in the surroundings. There are no trees at this altitude. The terrain is rocky and arid. The Sierra began to form 10 million years ago and are made of speckled granite that shines like crystal. It seems impossible that anything can survive in this lunar landscape, yet I noticed a patch of stubby plants under a boulder. I lay down, with my head in the shade.
Ten minutes later, Kerry returned. He said he had been worried about me — and had also seen the drop-offs. He had decided to let Sean head for the summit on his own. “I was so happy when I heard your footsteps,” I said.
“What if it had been that crazy guy?” Kerry said, teasing me.
As Kerry and I rested near a boulder, a hawk soared above us, coasting on thermal air as if its engine had run out of gas. We were enveloped in hot stillness. The hawk and granite had a timeless quality, as if we had slipped back 13,000 years. I half expected Paleoindians to emerge over the hill, hunting for antelope.
“Did you hear something?” Kerry asked.
I heard a faint voice. “Go down,” Sean called. I wasn’t sure if he was trying to tell us something practical like, ‘I’m going down a different way now — meet you at the campsite.’ Or something terrifying like, ‘I am trapped on a ledge. Go and find a search-and-rescue team.’ I froze. Then, a moment later he was walking across the rocks below us. He had been gone for an hour or so, but it had seemed like several ice ages.
“I was afraid we lost you,” I said. A moment earlier, I had been so glad to see him that tears welled up in my eyes.
He said that happens to his wife, too, when she sees him. He was joking, of course, and I laughed — but not hard. He must have known I was angry, because after a moment he looked into the distance and said, “I’m sorry.” I smacked him on the back of his head, and we started down toward the campsite. We had been out nine hours that day.
After four days of hiking, Sean and I set up lawn chairs near a tangle of rose bushes a few yards from a pool at a Best Western off Highway 395. Before our trip, the Sierra Nevada had meant little to me — “brown rock, blue sky,” as Kerry described the landscape. Yet now as I sat in my lawn chair, I had a different perspective. Looking at the range in the distance was like reading a Russian novel. The view was full of drama and foreboding.
“Most people exist so swaddled against danger, measuring out their lives with coffee spoons, that those who reckon by a different calculation of risk and reward appear insane,” wrote Michael Ybarra in The Wall Street Journal in 2009, three years before his death. “Yet to survive a perilous situation is to love life more than the average person can imagine.”
I do not believe you have to look over a cliff in order to appreciate life intensely. Yet that is what Mr. Ybarra believed and what my brother still believes, and now I have a better sense of why.
HOW EXTREME?
Rankings are from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very).
Remoteness 3
The place is popular, with semi-heavy foot traffic on the trail. Yet there is no cellphone reception for miles. If anything goes wrong, it will take hours to get to a place where you can call a search-and-rescue team.
Creature Discomforts 2
The campsite is pretty — and about 10,000 feet high. At this altitude, some people will suffer from shortness of breath and headaches (Advil helps).
Physical Difficulty 2
If you are in shape, you can make it up Mount Langley. You have to scramble over boulders for a couple of hundred feet, though, and as my brother Kerry says, “I don’t like the areas where if I trip, I’m dead.” It’s your call.


Saturday, October 5, 2013

Driver: I Was Brutally Beaten By Highway Patrol

thetruckersreport.com
Notice at the end, trial to begin in 2015?! Must be California! Story thanks to thetruckersreport.com and Landline. Link provided below:
A trucker pulled over in California for a routine traffic stop is claiming that the highway patrol officers who pulled him over used excessive force while arresting him for crimes that he didn’t commit. The driver was allegedly tased and beaten so badly that he received broken bones, multiple fractured ribs, a concussion, traumatic brain injury, and facial fractures so severe that he had to receivereconstructive surgery.
The driver, 58-year-old Olegs Kozacenko immigrated from Russia where he worked as a maritime engineer. He both reads and speaks English. Kozacenko has claimed that his horrible treatment may have been because of his Russian/Latvian ethnicity and accent.
The incident occurred when Kozacenko was pulled over by two CHP officers who requested his license, logbook, and medical card. One of the officers began writing him up for being over hours, despite the fact that he still had an hour left in his 11-hour day. The other trooper climbed in his truck and began searching his sleeper without his permission.
Despite not having found any reason to do so, the officers wrote him up for a DUI. They ended up also charging him with resisting arrest when he asked to read the summons to appear in court. Because he asked to read the summons, he claims that one of the officers bent his left arm behind his back and then both started beating him.
The complaint also alleges that the officers “submitted deliberately inaccurate reports and declarations of probable cause in this incident, stating or implying that Kozacenko was violating the law and that his arrest was reasonable, including alleging that Kozacenko was driving under the influence of alcohols and/or drugs.”
When Kozacenko was taken to the hospital, no evidence of drugs or alcohol showed up on blood tests.
Kozacenko has filed a complaint not only against the two officers who beat him, but also their superiors, alleging that they “failed to adequately supervise, investigate and disciple officers’ use of excessive force.”
According to the complaint, he suffered a significant concussion, contusions, convulsions, significant traumatic brain injury, and has been diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder. He is currently unable to work. He is seeking compensatory, punitive and exemplary damages.
His case has been scheduled to begin trial in February of 2015.


Wednesday, October 2, 2013

9 firefighters accused of vandalizing Milwaukee firehouse, chief says

firecritic.com
How weird is this? Story thanks to the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. Link provided below:
The nine Milwaukee firefighters placed on administrative suspension this week are accused of vandalizing Engine House 32, where they were stationed, Milwaukee's fire chief said Wednesday.
Chief Mark Rohlfing, in expanding on his Tuesday announcement of the suspensions, declined to give specifics of the vandalism, adding that early media reports of the allegations' details might not be true.
The nine firefighters have been suspended with pay as the department investigates the vandalism and other inappropriate conduct allegations.
The engine house is in the 1500 block of N. 30th St. The vandalism apparently took place Saturday evening and was discovered at 8 a.m. Sunday, when the nine firefighters' shifts ended. Most members of the engine house were being transferred to other locations, and that was their last shift together, Rohlfing said.
"We transfer people all the time, but usually we don't transfer most of the people at one engine house in one shot," the chief said. "We decided this engine house needed some fresh faces."
The nine firefighters were suspended Monday. Their shifts are being covered with additional staffing.
"When we look at what went on there, and I think I speak for myself and the department, it's upsetting and disappointing," Rohlfing said. "Our core value is integrity, and we hold them to a pretty high standard."
Assistant Chief Gerard Washington will lead the investigation, and the Milwaukee city attorney's office will assist as needed. The department is still gathering written statements, which is one reason Rohlfing said he did not want to disclose details of the allegations.
Milwaukee Fire and Police Commission Executive Director Michael Tobin said Tuesday night that the commission had been notified of the suspensions and will assist in the investigation. Mayor Tom Barrett also was notified and supports a complete investigation, a spokesman said Tuesday.
"It's in our interest as much as anybody's to find out the truth and hold those members accountable," Rohlfing said.

Read more from JSOnline: http://www.jsonline.com/news/milwaukee/9-firefighters-accused-of-vandalizing-milwaukee-firehouse-chief-says-b99111863z1-226174881.html#ixzz2gbZohBWc 
Follow us: @NewsHub on Twitter


Tuesday, October 1, 2013

Is the new Wi-Fi standard worth the money?

gizmag.com
Story thanks to Kim Komando at komando.com Link provided below:

Home networks used to be the realm of hardcore techies. Now most homes have smartphones, tablets, laptops, TVs, streaming video boxes and video game consoles. That makes a home network practically mandatory.Is the new Wi-Fi standard worth the money?

Fortunately, today's networks are much easier to set up, thanks to wireless networks. No one likes running cables all over the house.

Despite the convenience, wireless networks do have drawbacks. For example, speed and range can vary wildly. Thankfully, these both improve with every generation of Wi-Fi.
The latest 802.11ac standard is no exception. Manufacturers boast speeds more than 3 times faster than previous Wi-Fi generations. That's quite a jump!
To get that speed, you'll need to buy a new router, of course. So the big question is whether it's worth the cost.
For those not up on the jumble of letters and numbers that relate to wireless standards, let me explain. The designation 802.11 is the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers standard for Wi-Fi. The letter following 802.11 indicates the version of the standard.
Up until this point, consumer routers have mainly used 802.11b, 802.11g and 802.11n. These are usually listed as 'b,' 'g' and 'n' on product packaging. You'll also see 802.11a support on some routers, but don't confuse that with 802.11ac.

For each new Wi-Fi standard, speed and range increase. Plus, there are new encryption methods for security, new frequencies and other complex behind-the-scenes technology.
Now that there are more than 26 Wi-Fi revisions, we're into the double letters. That makes the newest consumer version 802.11ac, or Wireless AC, or 'ac' or however else companies will choose to brand it.

On the pro side, 802.11ac is blazing fast. At an advertised 1.75 gigabits per second, it's faster than a high-end wired home network. Right now, wired home networks top out at 1 gigabit.
In fact, 802.11ac can stream high-definition video to several gadgets at once. In a media-heavy home, that is a definite plus.
As far as range goes, solid figures are hard to come by. It really depends on your home, router placement and other factors. Still, you should see a more solid connection than older Wi-Fi standards.
Unfortunately, that's about it for the pro side. The cons are going to take a bit longer.

The major drawback is compatibility. To take advantage of 802.11ac features, you need gadgets that support 802.11ac. While it's been out for a year, very few gadgets support it.
I've seen some laptops with it, and a few smartphones, including the Samsung Galaxy S4. But it will take a while before every new gadget has it.
Just supporting 802.11ac isn't enough either. To get the full benefit, a gadget has to support the correct sub frequencies or have multiple antennas. Lower-cost models probably won't for a while.

So, you might get anywhere from 450 megabits per second to 1.75 gigabits per second performance depend on your gadget. True, 450Mbps is still very fast, but it's not the connection you paid for.
Don't forget the expense of buying gadgets with 802.11ac support. Of course, nobody said you have to upgrade everything right away.
Routers with 802.11ac also support all the old Wi-Fi standards. Your existing gadgets will still work. They just won't be any faster than they already are.
Speaking of cost, though, routers with 802.11ac aren't cheap. They start at $160 online and go up from there. So it's not a small investment.

On the plus side, these are high-end routers, so you get all the latest goodies. Think high-end encryption, parental control extras, multiple networks, multimedia packet shaping and so on. Plus they have a gigabit wired connection. Once you buy, you shouldn't have to upgrade for quite a few years.
In the end, it comes down to how you use the Internet. If you have one or two gadgets you use for social media and email, 802.11ac isn't for you. You're much better off sticking with your current router, or buying a low-cost 802.11n model.

If, however, you need a new router, and your home is filled with gadgets pulling down gigabytes of Internet traffic a day, definitely give 802.11ac a look. It might not do you good right away, but it will definitely help in the future.
For everyone else, I'd wait until 802.11ac routers drop in price and you already own a few 802.11ac gadgets.
Whatever you buy, don't forget to enable the encryption. This will keep neighbors and criminals off your network.  Click here to learn how to secure your network.